A comparative analysis of the FBR ordinance of the united states and the district unit plan of the Seoul in coping with gentrification - Focused on the location regulation of commercial facilities -

This study aimed to draw implications by comparing and analyzing the FBR ordinance in the U.S., which is being implemented for the purpose of preserving regional characteristics, starting with the perception that the method of regulating franchise locations used in the Seoul District Unit Plan in coping with Gentrification has limitations. To this end, the background of the two systems, issues related to the implementation of the system, the definition, type, and method of regulation of targets regulated by each system were compared and analyzed, and how the actual commercial facility location regulation process would be. Since the FBR ordinance regulates Formula Business that sells standardized services and products that do not reflect regional characteristics, there is a difference in the definition of regulated targets from franchisees regulated in the district unit plan. In addition, as for the regulatory method, the FBR ordinance establishes not only regulated and unregulated areas, but also conditionally licensed areas to examine the suitability of the location and aesthetic compatibility of the business to be entered. so in district unit plan, more detailed regulatory method and procedure is needed because even the residents' council is not activated.