Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A comparative study of oral cyclosporine and betamethasone minipulse therapy in the treatment of alopecia areata

  • Kyungpook National University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Various systemic agents have been assessed for the treatment of alopecia areata (AA); however, there is a paucity of comparative studies. Objective: To assess and compare cyclosporine and betamethasone minipulse therapy as treatments for AA with regard to effectiveness and safety. Methods: Data were collected from 88 patients who received at least 3 months of oral cyclosporine (n=51) or betamethasone minipulse therapy (n=37) for AA. Patients with ≥50% of terminal hair regrowth in the alopecic area were considered responders. Results: The responder of the cyclosporine group was 54.9% and that of the betamethasone minipulse group was 37.8%. In the cyclosporine group, patients with mild AA were found to respond better to the treatment. Based on the patient self-assessments, 70.6% of patients in the cyclosporine group and 43.2% of patients in the betamethasone minipulse group rated their hair regrowth as excellent or good. Side effects were less frequent in the cyclosporine group. Conclusion: Oral cyclosporine appeared to be superior to betamethasone minipulse therapy in terms of treatment effectiveness and safety.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)569-574
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Dermatology
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Alopecia areata
  • Betamethasone
  • Comparative study
  • Cyclosporine
  • Pulse drug therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study of oral cyclosporine and betamethasone minipulse therapy in the treatment of alopecia areata'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this