An Alternative Serological Measure for Assessing Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccine Efficacy against Homologous and Heterologous Viral Challenges in Pigs

Jaejo Kim, Seung Heon Lee, Ha Hyun Kim, Sung Ho Shin, Sang Hyun Park, Jong Hyeon Park, Choi Kyu Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

To analyze the relationship between homologous and heterologous serological titers of immunized pigs and their protection statuses against FMD virus challenges, in the present study, the correlation between the virus neutralization titers at 21 and 28 dpv and the protection statuses at 28 dpv against challenge with FMD virus was analyzed using data sets comprising five different combinations of homologous or heterologous challenge experiments in pigs vaccinated with type O (n = 96), A (n = 69), and Asia 1 (n = 74). As a result, the experiments were divided into three groups (21D-1, 21D-2, and 21D-3) in the 21-dpv model and two groups (28D-1 and 28D-2) in the 28-dpv model. Each response curve of groups 21D-1 and 21D-2 in the 21-dpv model was very similar to each curve of groups 28D-1 and 28D-2 in the 28-dpv model, respectively, even though there was an exceptional extra group (21D-3) in the 21-dpv model. The average titers estimating 0.75 probability of protection ranged from 1.06 to 1.62 log10 in the 21-dpv model and from 1.26 to 1.64 log10 in the 28-dpv model. In summary, we demonstrated that the serological method is useful for predicting the homologous and heterologous protection statuses of vaccinated pigs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number10
JournalVaccines
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024

Keywords

  • estimating the protection status
  • foot-and-mouth disease
  • indirect potency test
  • vaccination
  • virus neutralization antibody

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Alternative Serological Measure for Assessing Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccine Efficacy against Homologous and Heterologous Viral Challenges in Pigs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this