Abstract
The original version of this Article contained errors in the Abstract. “The VRN-based 3D CNN outperformed orthopedists specialized in shoulder and general orthopedists in binary accuracy (92.5% vs. 76.4% and 68.2%), top-1 accuracy (69.0% vs. 45.8% and 30.5%), top-1±1 accuracy (87.5% vs. 79.8% and 71.0%), sensitivity (0.94 vs. 0.86 and 0.90), and specificity (0.90 vs. 0.58 and 0.29).” now reads: “The VRN-based 3D CNN outperformed orthopedists specialized in shoulder and general orthopedists in binary accuracy (92.5% vs. 76.4% and 68.2%), top-1 accuracy (69.0% vs. 45.8% and 30.5%), top-1±1 accuracy (87.5% vs. 79.8% and 71.0%), sensitivity (0.92 vs. 0.89 and 0.93), and specificity (0.86 vs. 0.61 and 0.26).” The original Article has been corrected.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 15996 |
Journal | Scientific Reports |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Dec 2021 |