TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Block Using Local Anesthetics with or without a Steroid for Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy
AU - Park, Eugene J.
AU - Kim, Seong Min
AU - Chung, Seungho
AU - Min, Woo Kie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Korean Society of Spine Surgery Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Study Design: A retrospective chart review. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of cervical transforaminal epidural block (CTEB) using local anesthetics with or without a steroid for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Summary of Literature Review: The typical mixture for a CTEB is a combination of local anesthetics with a non-particulate steroid. However, there are potential complications related to steroid injections such as steroid-induced osteoporosis, hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal gland axis suppression, and hyperglycemia. Materials and Methods: From January 2018 to October 2019, 35 patients who underwent CTEB for CSR were enrolled in this study. Cases with arm pain over 4 on a visual analog scale (VAS) were included. In the first 19 cases, a combination of 1 mL of 1% lidocaine and 1 mL of dexamethasone was used (group A), and in the next 16 cases, 1 mL of 1% lidocaine mixed with 1 mL of normal saline was used (group B). Arm pain VAS and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) were obtained perioperatively. Results: Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. In both groups, the arm pain VAS significantly decreased at 30 minutes, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks post-injection compared to pre-injection values. However, the arm pain aggravated 12 weeks post-injection. The NDI of both groups significantly improved 6 weeks post-injection compared to pre-injection. The clinical outcomes of arm pain VAS and NDI at 30 minutes, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks post-injection, as well as the amounts of change, were not significantly different between both groups. Conclusions: CTEB for CSR without a steroid improved symptoms by 6 weeks. The degree of improvement was similar to when CTEB was performed with a steroid in terms of VAS and NDI.
AB - Study Design: A retrospective chart review. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of cervical transforaminal epidural block (CTEB) using local anesthetics with or without a steroid for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Summary of Literature Review: The typical mixture for a CTEB is a combination of local anesthetics with a non-particulate steroid. However, there are potential complications related to steroid injections such as steroid-induced osteoporosis, hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal gland axis suppression, and hyperglycemia. Materials and Methods: From January 2018 to October 2019, 35 patients who underwent CTEB for CSR were enrolled in this study. Cases with arm pain over 4 on a visual analog scale (VAS) were included. In the first 19 cases, a combination of 1 mL of 1% lidocaine and 1 mL of dexamethasone was used (group A), and in the next 16 cases, 1 mL of 1% lidocaine mixed with 1 mL of normal saline was used (group B). Arm pain VAS and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) were obtained perioperatively. Results: Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. In both groups, the arm pain VAS significantly decreased at 30 minutes, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks post-injection compared to pre-injection values. However, the arm pain aggravated 12 weeks post-injection. The NDI of both groups significantly improved 6 weeks post-injection compared to pre-injection. The clinical outcomes of arm pain VAS and NDI at 30 minutes, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks post-injection, as well as the amounts of change, were not significantly different between both groups. Conclusions: CTEB for CSR without a steroid improved symptoms by 6 weeks. The degree of improvement was similar to when CTEB was performed with a steroid in terms of VAS and NDI.
KW - Cervical vertebrae
KW - Dexamethasone
KW - Lidocaine
KW - Nerve block
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181968279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4184/jkss.2020.27.4.115
DO - 10.4184/jkss.2020.27.4.115
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85181968279
SN - 2093-4378
VL - 27
SP - 115
EP - 124
JO - Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
JF - Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
IS - 4
ER -