Comparative efficacies of collagen-based 3D printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts and biphasic calcium phosphate bone substitute for bone regeneration

Kyoung Sub Hwang, Jae Won Choi, Jae Hun Kim, Ho Yun Chung, Songwan Jin, Jin Hyung Shim, Won Soo Yun, Chang Mo Jeong, Jung Bo Huh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare bone regeneration and space maintaining ability of three-dimensional (3D) printed bone grafts with conventional biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP). After mixing polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) in a 4:4:2 ratio, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP particulate bone grafts were fabricated using 3D printing technology. Fabricated particulate bone grafts were mixed with atelocollagen to produce collagen-based PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts. After formation of calvarial defects 8 mm in diameter, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts and BCP were implanted into bone defects of 32 rats. Although PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts were not superior in bone regeneration ability compared to BCP, the results showed relatively similar performance. Furthermore, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts showed better ability to maintain bone defects and to support barrier membranes than BCP. Therefore, within the limitations of this study, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts could be considered as an alternative to synthetic bone grafts available for clinical use.

Original languageEnglish
Article number421
JournalMaterials
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 17 Apr 2017

Keywords

  • 3D printing
  • BCP
  • Bone grafts
  • Collagen
  • PCL/PLGA/β-TCP

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative efficacies of collagen-based 3D printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts and biphasic calcium phosphate bone substitute for bone regeneration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this