Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative efficacies of collagen-based 3D printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts and biphasic calcium phosphate bone substitute for bone regeneration

  • Kyoung Sub Hwang
  • , Jae Won Choi
  • , Jae Hun Kim
  • , Ho Yun Chung
  • , Songwan Jin
  • , Jin Hyung Shim
  • , Won Soo Yun
  • , Chang Mo Jeong
  • , Jung Bo Huh
  • Pusan National University
  • Tech University of Korea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare bone regeneration and space maintaining ability of three-dimensional (3D) printed bone grafts with conventional biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP). After mixing polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) in a 4:4:2 ratio, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP particulate bone grafts were fabricated using 3D printing technology. Fabricated particulate bone grafts were mixed with atelocollagen to produce collagen-based PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts. After formation of calvarial defects 8 mm in diameter, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts and BCP were implanted into bone defects of 32 rats. Although PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts were not superior in bone regeneration ability compared to BCP, the results showed relatively similar performance. Furthermore, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts showed better ability to maintain bone defects and to support barrier membranes than BCP. Therefore, within the limitations of this study, PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts could be considered as an alternative to synthetic bone grafts available for clinical use.

Original languageEnglish
Article number421
JournalMaterials
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 17 Apr 2017

Keywords

  • 3D printing
  • BCP
  • Bone grafts
  • Collagen
  • PCL/PLGA/β-TCP

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative efficacies of collagen-based 3D printed PCL/PLGA/β-TCP composite block bone grafts and biphasic calcium phosphate bone substitute for bone regeneration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this