Comparison of monomeric and polymeric chiral stationary phases

Kwang Pill Lee, Seong Ho Choi, Soo Yeon Kim, Tae Hyuk Kim, Jae Jeong Ryoo, Kazutoku Ohta, Ji Ye Jin, Toyohide Takeuchi, Chuzo Fujimoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two-type polymeric chiral stationary phases (pCSPs) were prepared by surface grafting of chiral acryl-type monomers on a silica gel surface modified with 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propylmethacrylate. The prepared pCSPs were characterized by IR, FT-Raman, scanning electron microscopy, and elemental analysis. In addition, two-type monomeric chiral stationary phases (mCSPs) were also prepared. The racemic analytes were separated using the prepared mCSPs and pCSPs. The separation factor (α) and capacity factor (k1) of the racemic analytes for the pCSP and mCSP were compared. The α and k1 values of the mCSP were higher than those of the pCSP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-118
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Chromatography A
Volume987
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 14 Feb 2003

Keywords

  • Amino acids
  • Chiral stationary phases, LC
  • Naphthylene methylethyl propanamide
  • Retention factor
  • Separation factor
  • Surface grafting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of monomeric and polymeric chiral stationary phases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this