Comparison study of the response with botulinum toxin muscle injection in the ICR mice from three different sources

Min Soo Seo, Young In Kim, Kyung Ku Kang, Se Kyung Oh, Soo Eun Sung, Young Suk Jung, Joon Yong Cho, Hyun Keun Song, Dae Youn Hwang, Sang Joon Park, Kil Soo Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Botulinum-toxin A (BoNT/A) is a widely used not only for cosmetics but also for various experimental purposes including muscle-related research. In this study, we applied BoNT/A to mouse muscle of three different sources to compare and evaluate the biological and pathological response. The three different mouse sources consist of Korl:ICR (Korea FDA source), A:ICR (USA source) and B:ICR (Japan source) which were purchased from each different vendors. To compare the responses of ICR mice with BoNT/A muscle injection, we examined the body weight, hematological and serum biochemistry analysis. Also, we evaluated the muscle change by histopathological analysis and gene expression patterns of muscle-related target by qPCR. The body weight gain was decreased in the BoNT/A-treated group compared with the control group. In clinical pathologic analysis and gene expression patterns, the data showed that the responses in the BoNT/A-treated group were similar compared with the control group. Decreased muscle fiber was observed in BoNT/A-treated group compared with control group, while Korl:ICR showed a little low response with the other mouse sources. In conclusion, our results suggest that three different sources ICR mice (Korl:ICR, A:ICR and B:ICR) have a similar biological and pathological responses in BoNT/A muscle injection.

Original languageEnglish
Article number11
JournalLaboratory Animal Research
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2019

Keywords

  • Botulinum toxin
  • ICR mouse
  • Korl:ICR
  • Muscle

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison study of the response with botulinum toxin muscle injection in the ICR mice from three different sources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this