Abstract
This paper provides the results of a cost-benefit analysis for BeO-UO 2 nuclear fuel, material that contains a small volume fraction of Be in uranium oxide matrix. According to the cost-benefit analysis results, the optimized BeO content was about 4.8 wt% when the BeO and uranium oxide prices were assumed to be $317/kg and $64/kg, respectively. The benefit of increasing the thermal conductivity of BeO-UO2 fuel was greater than the burden of the expensive BeO material price if the BeO content was 4.8 wt%. In addition, the break-even point of the nuclear fuel cycle cost as a function of the burn-up was 4.4 mills/kWh when compared economically between BeO-UO2 fuel and UO2 fuel. Therefore, BeO-UO2 fuel seems economically efficient when the burn-up is more than 60 MWD/kg because the nuclear fuel cycle cost of BeO-UO2 fuel was lower than that of UO2 fuel.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 813-821 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Progress in Nuclear Energy |
Volume | 52 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2010 |
Keywords
- Beryllium
- Burn-up
- Cost-benefit analysis
- Nuclear fuel cycle
- Thermal conductivity