Cost-benefit analysis of BeO-UO2 nuclear fuel

S. K. Kim, W. I. Ko, H. D. Kim, Shripad T. Revankar, W. Zhou, Daeseong Jo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper provides the results of a cost-benefit analysis for BeO-UO 2 nuclear fuel, material that contains a small volume fraction of Be in uranium oxide matrix. According to the cost-benefit analysis results, the optimized BeO content was about 4.8 wt% when the BeO and uranium oxide prices were assumed to be $317/kg and $64/kg, respectively. The benefit of increasing the thermal conductivity of BeO-UO2 fuel was greater than the burden of the expensive BeO material price if the BeO content was 4.8 wt%. In addition, the break-even point of the nuclear fuel cycle cost as a function of the burn-up was 4.4 mills/kWh when compared economically between BeO-UO2 fuel and UO2 fuel. Therefore, BeO-UO2 fuel seems economically efficient when the burn-up is more than 60 MWD/kg because the nuclear fuel cycle cost of BeO-UO2 fuel was lower than that of UO2 fuel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)813-821
Number of pages9
JournalProgress in Nuclear Energy
Volume52
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010

Keywords

  • Beryllium
  • Burn-up
  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Nuclear fuel cycle
  • Thermal conductivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-benefit analysis of BeO-UO2 nuclear fuel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this