Cultural censorship in defective democracy: the South Korean blacklist case

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper attempts to understand the cultural censorship practiced in contemporary South Korea, a liberal democracy, where cultural quangos were established after political democratization, following the arm’s length model. I will focus on the analysis of cases from the film industry which has been central to the censorship debate historically in Korea because of its popular appeal. The establishment of arm’s length cultural organizations laid the foundation for freedom of cultural expression which had been seriously curtailed under military rule. However, recent revelations of cultural blacklist cases under the two previous administrations are baffling to understand since rampant political censorship was practiced through ostensibly autonomous cultural organizations. The paper examines the ways in which the state constructed a ‘system of ideological censorship’ by using not only cultural quangos but non-cultural state apparatuses. In so doing, the paper emphasizes the role of non-cultural policy state institutions in the operation of cultural policy and the effect of state systems on cultural organizations. I draw upon the concept of defective democracy to understand the socio-political condition where these cultural organizations exist.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-47
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Cultural Policy
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • blacklist
  • cultural quangos
  • defective democracy
  • Film censorship
  • non-cultural policy state apparatuses

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cultural censorship in defective democracy: the South Korean blacklist case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this