Differential expression of PI3K isoforms and correlation with clinicopathological factors in patients with gastric cancer

Hyoun Wook Lee, Eun Hee Lee, Moon Il Park, Mee Seon Kim, Jin Sook Jeong, Mee Sook Roh, Dae Cheol Kim, Su Jin Kim, Min Gyoung Pak, Seo Hee Rha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) is pivotal for the oncogenic PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. This study assessed the differential expression of PI3K isoforms in gastric cancer and correlation with clinicopathological parameters. Tissue microarray blocks were generated from 153 gastric cancers and immunohistochemically stained for 4 PI3K isoforms: p110α, p110β, p110γ and p110δ. Isoform p110α was more highly expressed in tumors with a diameter less than 4 cm (P=0.009); lower pathological T (pT) stage (P < 0.001), N stage (P=0.001), or TNM stage (P < 0.001); and no lymphovascular invasion (P=0.001); p110β was significantly associated with advanced pT stage (P=0.028) and lymphovascular invasion (P=0.014). High p110α expression significantly correlated with longer overall survival (OS) (P=0.007) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P=0.048), whereas high p110β expression correlated with shorter OS (P=0.008) and RFS (P=0.058). In addition, p110β was an independent factor for poor prognosis in multivariate analysis for OS. Neither p110γ nor p110δ expression showed clinicopathological significance. These results suggested that p110β might be more important for the development and progression of gastric cancer than other PI3K isoforms and had potential as a prognostic biomarker in patients with gastric cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1588-1597
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
Volume9
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Gastric cancer
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • P110α
  • P110β
  • Prognosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differential expression of PI3K isoforms and correlation with clinicopathological factors in patients with gastric cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this