TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of glazing configuration as an energy-saving strategy in naturally ventilated greenhouses for strawberry (Seolhyang sp.) cultivation
AU - Akpenpuun, Timothy Denen
AU - Na, Wook Ho
AU - Ogunlowo, Qazeem Opeyemi
AU - Rabiu, Anis
AU - Adesanya, Misbaudeen Aderemi
AU - Addae, Kwame Sasu
AU - Kim, Hyeon Tae
AU - Lee, Hyun Woo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© the Author(s), 2021.
PY - 2021/6/28
Y1 - 2021/6/28
N2 - Strawberry cultivation is highly dependent on environmental parameters and energy in winter. Two gothic greenhouses with different glazing material combinations, i.e. polyolefin-thermal screen (PoTS) and polyolefin-thermal screen-polyethylene (PoTSPe), were used for strawberry cultivation. The energy-sav-ing capabilities of the two configurations and their impact on the microclimates of the greenhouses were investigated. Temperature, relative humidity, vapor pressure deficit, leaf temperature, and solar radiation over the experimental period in the PoTS greenhouse were 13.0±2.3°C, 75.8±6.5%, 0.4±0.1 kPa, 13.6±1.7°C, and 168.8±82.3W/m2, respectively, whereas in the PoTSPe setup they were 13.1±2.3°C, 80.0±5.7%, 0.3±0.1 kPa, 13.5±1.6°C, and e 183.1±90.5 W/m2. The mean fuel consumption by the PoTS and PoTSPe greenhouses were 5.5 and 3.5 L, respectively. The performance analysis shows that both greenhouses were able to maintain the environmental parameters and leaf temperature within the rec-ommended ranges, although more energy was consumed with PoTS. A higher yield was obtained in the PoTS greenhouse, which, however, was not significantly different from the PoTSPe yield.
AB - Strawberry cultivation is highly dependent on environmental parameters and energy in winter. Two gothic greenhouses with different glazing material combinations, i.e. polyolefin-thermal screen (PoTS) and polyolefin-thermal screen-polyethylene (PoTSPe), were used for strawberry cultivation. The energy-sav-ing capabilities of the two configurations and their impact on the microclimates of the greenhouses were investigated. Temperature, relative humidity, vapor pressure deficit, leaf temperature, and solar radiation over the experimental period in the PoTS greenhouse were 13.0±2.3°C, 75.8±6.5%, 0.4±0.1 kPa, 13.6±1.7°C, and 168.8±82.3W/m2, respectively, whereas in the PoTSPe setup they were 13.1±2.3°C, 80.0±5.7%, 0.3±0.1 kPa, 13.5±1.6°C, and e 183.1±90.5 W/m2. The mean fuel consumption by the PoTS and PoTSPe greenhouses were 5.5 and 3.5 L, respectively. The performance analysis shows that both greenhouses were able to maintain the environmental parameters and leaf temperature within the rec-ommended ranges, although more energy was consumed with PoTS. A higher yield was obtained in the PoTS greenhouse, which, however, was not significantly different from the PoTSPe yield.
KW - Fuel consumption
KW - humidity
KW - microclimate
KW - temperature
KW - winter
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115211336&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4081/JAE.2021.1177
DO - 10.4081/JAE.2021.1177
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85115211336
SN - 1974-7071
VL - 52
JO - Journal of Agricultural Engineering
JF - Journal of Agricultural Engineering
IS - 2
M1 - 1177
ER -