Effectiveness of mobile health application use to improve health behavior changes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Myeunghee Han, Eunjoo Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

118 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of mobile health applications in changing health-related behaviors and clinical health outcomes. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in this study. We conducted a comprehensive bibliographic search of articles on health behavior changes related to the use of mobile health applications in peer-reviewed journals published between January 1, 2000 and May 31, 2017. We used databases including CHINAHL, Ovid-Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed. The risk of bias assessment of the retrieved articles was examined using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Results: A total of 20 articles met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen among 20 studies reported that applications have a positive impact on the targeted health behaviors or clinical health outcomes. In addition, most of the studies, which examined the satisfaction of participants, showed health app users have a statistically significant higher satisfaction. Conclusions: Despite the high risk of bias, such as selection, performance, and detection, this systematic review found that the use of mobile health applications has a positive impact on health-related behaviors and clinical health outcomes. Application users were more satisfied with using mobile health applications to manage their health in comparison to users of conventional care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-226
Number of pages20
JournalHealthcare Informatics Research
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2018

Keywords

  • Health behavior
  • Mobile applications
  • Mobile health
  • Review
  • Smartphone

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of mobile health application use to improve health behavior changes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this