Effects of parasitic gate capacitance and gate resistance on radiofrequency performance in LG = 0.15 μm GaN high-electron-mobility transistors for X-band applications

  • Sung Jae Chang
  • , Hyeon Seok Jeong
  • , Hyun Wook Jung
  • , Su Min Choi
  • , Il Gyu Choi
  • , Youn Sub Noh
  • , Seong Il Kim
  • , Sang Heung Lee
  • , Ho Kyun Ahn
  • , Dong Min Kang
  • , Dae Hyun Kim
  • , Jong Won Lim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The effects of the parasitic gate capacitance and gate resistance (Rg) on the radiofrequency (RF) performance are investigated in LG = 0.15 μm GaN high-electron-mobility transistors with T-gate head size ranging from 0.83 to 1.08 μm. When the device characteristics are compared, the difference in DC characteristics is negligible. The RF performance in terms of the current-gain cut-off frequency (fT) and maximum oscillation frequency (fmax) substantially depend on the T-gate head size. For clarifying the T-gate head size dependence, small-signal modeling is conducted to extract the parasitic gate capacitance and Rg. When the T-gate head size is reduced from 1.08 to 0.83 μm, Rg increases by 82%, while fT and fmax improve by 27% and 26%, respectively, because the parasitic gate–source and gate–drain capacitances reduce by 19% and 43%, respectively. Therefore, minimizing the parasitic gate capacitance is more effective that reducing Rg in our transistor design and fabrication, leading to improved RF performance when reducing the T-gate head size.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1090-1102
Number of pages13
JournalETRI Journal
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • GaN
  • T-gate
  • gate head size
  • gate resistance
  • high-electron-mobility transistor
  • parasitic gate capacitance
  • small-signal modeling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of parasitic gate capacitance and gate resistance on radiofrequency performance in LG = 0.15 μm GaN high-electron-mobility transistors for X-band applications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this