TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of percutaneous nephrostomy during flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone management
AU - Kwon, Se Yun
AU - Kim, Bum Soo
AU - Kim, Hyun Tae
AU - Park, Yoon Kyu
PY - 2013/10
Y1 - 2013/10
N2 - Purpose: Preoperative percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) can be applied to urinary stone patients with pyelonephritis as well as obstructive uropathy; thus, some patients undergo flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) in the presence of a PCN tube. We evaluated the effectiveness of PCN during fURS for the management of renal stones. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 130 consecutive patients who un-derwent fURS for renal stones between January 2009 and December 2011. All fURS procedures were performed by a single experienced surgeon. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the presence of PCN during the surgery: patients with PCN (group 1, n=41) and patients without PCN (group 2, n=89). To evaluate operative outcomes, we compared success rates, operative times, and complication rates. We de-fined success as the absence of any residual stones in the kidney or stone fragments less than 2 mm that were too small to be extracted during follow-up. Results: There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, stone later-ality, burden, or location between the two groups. The mean operative times of groups 1 and 2 were 50.1 and 58.3 minutes, respectively (p=0.102). The success rates of groups 1 and 2 were 95.1% and 82.0%, respectively (p=0.044). There was no statistically sig-nificant difference in the complication rate between groups 1 and 2 (p=0.888). Conclusions: Flexible ureteroscopy in the presence of PCN produced a superior outcome in terms of the success rate without increasing the operative time or complication rate. PCN may be helpful to induce better outcomes of fURS.
AB - Purpose: Preoperative percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) can be applied to urinary stone patients with pyelonephritis as well as obstructive uropathy; thus, some patients undergo flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) in the presence of a PCN tube. We evaluated the effectiveness of PCN during fURS for the management of renal stones. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 130 consecutive patients who un-derwent fURS for renal stones between January 2009 and December 2011. All fURS procedures were performed by a single experienced surgeon. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the presence of PCN during the surgery: patients with PCN (group 1, n=41) and patients without PCN (group 2, n=89). To evaluate operative outcomes, we compared success rates, operative times, and complication rates. We de-fined success as the absence of any residual stones in the kidney or stone fragments less than 2 mm that were too small to be extracted during follow-up. Results: There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, stone later-ality, burden, or location between the two groups. The mean operative times of groups 1 and 2 were 50.1 and 58.3 minutes, respectively (p=0.102). The success rates of groups 1 and 2 were 95.1% and 82.0%, respectively (p=0.044). There was no statistically sig-nificant difference in the complication rate between groups 1 and 2 (p=0.888). Conclusions: Flexible ureteroscopy in the presence of PCN produced a superior outcome in terms of the success rate without increasing the operative time or complication rate. PCN may be helpful to induce better outcomes of fURS.
KW - Kidney calculi
KW - Percutaneous nephrostomy
KW - Ureteroscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886256210&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4111/kju.2013.54.10.689
DO - 10.4111/kju.2013.54.10.689
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84886256210
SN - 0494-4747
VL - 54
SP - 689
EP - 692
JO - Korean Journal of Urology
JF - Korean Journal of Urology
IS - 10
ER -