Abstract
The turbulent energy dissipation rate (EDR) is a quantitative measure of turbulence intensity, and it is widely used across various fields. Accurate estimation of EDR using Doppler lidar depends on the choice of estimation technique and scanning strategy. Therefore, a comparison of the techniques is still required to achieve an accurate estimation. However, the effect of the choice on estimation accuracy remains uncertain. This study systematically evaluates the accuracy of EDR estimation techniques by utilizing two distinct scanning strategies: a vertically pointing scan ( (Formula presented.) ) and a Plan Position Indicator scan ( (Formula presented.) ). We assess four different (Formula presented.) estimation techniques and assess the accuracy of (Formula presented.) for each elevation angle by comparing it with the measurements from sonic anemometers on a 300 m tall meteorological tower. (Formula presented.) shows a positive correlation coefficient exceeding 0.5 with the sonic anemometers. (Formula presented.) demonstrates dependency on the elevation angle, with lower angles resulting in higher EDR values. Conversely, all of the (Formula presented.) techniques exhibit high agreement, with correlation coefficients above 0.9. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the accuracy of each technique, highlighting their respective characteristics and practical considerations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 939 |
| Journal | Remote Sensing |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2025 |
Keywords
- Doppler lidar
- eddy dissipation rate
- turbulent energy dissipation rate