TY - JOUR
T1 - FANET Routing Protocol Analysis for Multi-UAV-Based Reconnaissance Mobility Models
AU - Kim, Taehwan
AU - Lee, Seonah
AU - Kim, Kyong Hoon
AU - Jo, Yong Il
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Different from mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) and vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs), a flying ad hoc network (FANET) is a very low-density network where node topology changes rapidly and irregularly. These characteristics, the density, mobility, and speed of flight nodes, affect the performance of FANET. Furthermore, application scenarios and environmental settings could affect the performance of FANETs. In this paper, we analyzed the representative FANET protocols, AODV, DSDV, and OLSR, according to mobility models, SRWP, MP, RDPZ, EGM, and DPR, under the multi-UAV-based reconnaissance scenario. We evaluated them in terms of the number of nodes, network connectivity, mobility model’s reconnaissance rate, speed of nodes, and ground control station (GCS) location. As a result, we found that AODV showed the highest PDR performance (81%) with SRWP in multiple UAV-based reconnaissance scenarios. As for a mobility model under the consideration of reconnaissance rate, SRWP was excellent at 76%, and RDPZ and EGM mobility models were reasonable at 62% and 60%, respectively. We also made several interesting observations such as how when the number of nodes increases, the connectivity of the network increases, but the performance of the routing protocol decreases, and how the GCS location affects the PDR performance of the combination of routing protocols and mobility models.
AB - Different from mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) and vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs), a flying ad hoc network (FANET) is a very low-density network where node topology changes rapidly and irregularly. These characteristics, the density, mobility, and speed of flight nodes, affect the performance of FANET. Furthermore, application scenarios and environmental settings could affect the performance of FANETs. In this paper, we analyzed the representative FANET protocols, AODV, DSDV, and OLSR, according to mobility models, SRWP, MP, RDPZ, EGM, and DPR, under the multi-UAV-based reconnaissance scenario. We evaluated them in terms of the number of nodes, network connectivity, mobility model’s reconnaissance rate, speed of nodes, and ground control station (GCS) location. As a result, we found that AODV showed the highest PDR performance (81%) with SRWP in multiple UAV-based reconnaissance scenarios. As for a mobility model under the consideration of reconnaissance rate, SRWP was excellent at 76%, and RDPZ and EGM mobility models were reasonable at 62% and 60%, respectively. We also made several interesting observations such as how when the number of nodes increases, the connectivity of the network increases, but the performance of the routing protocol decreases, and how the GCS location affects the PDR performance of the combination of routing protocols and mobility models.
KW - FANET
KW - NS-3
KW - mobility models
KW - multi-UAVs
KW - reconnaissance
KW - routing protocol
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152003838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/drones7030161
DO - 10.3390/drones7030161
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85152003838
SN - 2504-446X
VL - 7
JO - Drones
JF - Drones
IS - 3
M1 - 161
ER -