TY - JOUR
T1 - Healthcare utilization and treatment patterns in diabetic macular edema in Korea
T2 - A retrospective chart review
AU - Park, Kyu Hyung
AU - Kim, Yun Young
AU - Jo, Young Joon
AU - Oh, Jaeryung
AU - Lee, Joo Eun
AU - Lee, Ji Eun
AU - Park, Dong Ho
AU - Kang, Se Woong
AU - Lee, Won Ki
AU - Kim, Ha Kyoung
AU - Adena, Michael
AU - Tan, Jonathan
AU - Kim, Si Dong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.
PY - 2019/4/22
Y1 - 2019/4/22
N2 - Background: Limited data exist on real-world treatment patterns for diabetic macular edema (DME) in Korea. In this study, we investigated DME treatment patterns from 2009 to 2014 and the impact of baseline treatment on healthcare resource utilization and visual acuity (VA) outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort chart review of DME patients treated at 11 hospital ophthalmology clinics between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2013 was conducted. We collected data on demographics, healthcare resource utilization (clinic visits, treatment visits, and visits for ocular investigations), distribution of DME treatments, and VA. Results: Overall, 522 DME patients (men, 55.2%; mean age, 59 years; mean HbA1c [n = 209], 8.4%) with 842 DME eyes were evaluated. For all treatments, healthcare resource utilization was significantly higher during the first 6 months versus months 7-12, year 2, or year 3 (P ≤ 0.001), but was highest for patients whose first treatment was an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment (visits/quarter; anti-VEGF, 1.9; corticosteroids, 1.7; laser, 1.4). Use of macular laser therapy decreased (44% to 8%), whereas use of anti-VEGF injections increased (44% to 69%) during the study period. However, VA improvement was not commensurate with healthcare resource utilization of anti-VEGF treatment (mean VA gain, 2.7 letters). Conclusion: A trend toward increasing use of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for DME treatment was observed in Korea. However, the frequency of dosing and monitoring was lower in clinical practice versus major clinical trials, which may have led to the less-than-favorable improvements in visual outcomes.
AB - Background: Limited data exist on real-world treatment patterns for diabetic macular edema (DME) in Korea. In this study, we investigated DME treatment patterns from 2009 to 2014 and the impact of baseline treatment on healthcare resource utilization and visual acuity (VA) outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort chart review of DME patients treated at 11 hospital ophthalmology clinics between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2013 was conducted. We collected data on demographics, healthcare resource utilization (clinic visits, treatment visits, and visits for ocular investigations), distribution of DME treatments, and VA. Results: Overall, 522 DME patients (men, 55.2%; mean age, 59 years; mean HbA1c [n = 209], 8.4%) with 842 DME eyes were evaluated. For all treatments, healthcare resource utilization was significantly higher during the first 6 months versus months 7-12, year 2, or year 3 (P ≤ 0.001), but was highest for patients whose first treatment was an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment (visits/quarter; anti-VEGF, 1.9; corticosteroids, 1.7; laser, 1.4). Use of macular laser therapy decreased (44% to 8%), whereas use of anti-VEGF injections increased (44% to 69%) during the study period. However, VA improvement was not commensurate with healthcare resource utilization of anti-VEGF treatment (mean VA gain, 2.7 letters). Conclusion: A trend toward increasing use of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for DME treatment was observed in Korea. However, the frequency of dosing and monitoring was lower in clinical practice versus major clinical trials, which may have led to the less-than-favorable improvements in visual outcomes.
KW - Anti-VEGF
KW - Clinical practice patterns
KW - Intravitreal injections
KW - Laser therapy
KW - Visual acuity
KW - Visual outcomes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065076867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e118
DO - 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e118
M3 - Article
C2 - 31001935
AN - SCOPUS:85065076867
SN - 1011-8934
VL - 34
JO - Journal of Korean Medical Science
JF - Journal of Korean Medical Science
IS - 15
M1 - e118
ER -