Heat strain of Japanese firefighters wearing personal protective equipment: a review for developing a test method

Yutaka Tochihara, Joo Young Lee, Su Young Son, Ilham Bakri

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The aim of this review was to develop a test method for the evaluation of heat strain for structural firefighters wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) in Japan. We analysed a series of our laboratory’s questionnaires and experimental studies and reviewed international standards on test methods. We investigated the actual average working conditions (total firefighting time on one incidence, working time with full PPE, maximum temperature and humidity during firefighting) at structural firefighting site in Japan by conducting a large-scale questionnaire survey of Japanese firefighters. We discussed test subjects (firefighters vs. non-firefighters; body size; physical fitness), exercise intensity (absolutes vs. relative; light vs. heavy) and duration, experimental temperature and relative humidity, experimental clothing items including station uniforms (shorts vs. long), and measurement variables (physiological and subjective responses), and suggested a standard test method to evaluate the heat strain of firefighters in hot and humid environments. Practitioner summary: We reviewed studies on human wear trials of firefighting personal protective equipment (PPE) in hot environments and suggested a standard test method to evaluate the heat strain of firefighters. The test method can be internationally utilised to examine the comfort functions and heat stress of PPE in hot, humid environments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)676-689
Number of pages14
JournalErgonomics
Volume66
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Firefighters
  • heat stress
  • personal protective equipment
  • protective clothing
  • test method

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Heat strain of Japanese firefighters wearing personal protective equipment: a review for developing a test method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this