TY - JOUR
T1 - Intra-articular injection, subacromial injection, and hydrodilatation for primary frozen shoulder
T2 - A randomized clinical trial
AU - Yoon, Jong Pil
AU - Chung, Seok Won
AU - Kim, Ju Eun
AU - Kim, Hyung Sup
AU - Lee, Hyun Joo
AU - Jeong, Won Ju
AU - Oh, Kyung Soo
AU - Lee, Dong Oh
AU - Seo, Anna
AU - Kim, Youngjun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Background: The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the efficacy of 3 injection methods, intra-articular injection, subacromial injection, and hydrodilatation (HD), in the treatment of primary frozen shoulder. Methods: Patients with primary frozen shoulder were randomized to undergo intra-articular injection (n = 29), subacromial injection (n = 29), or HD (n = 28). Evaluations using a visual analog scale for pain, Simple Shoulder Test, Constant score, and passive range of shoulder motion were completed before treatment and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment. Results: Among the 3 injection methods for primary frozen shoulder, HD resulted in a greater range of motion in forward flexion and external rotation, a lower visual analog scale score for pain after 1 month, and better outcomes for all functional scores after 1 month and 3 months of follow-up. However, there were no significant differences in any clinical outcomes among the 3 groups in the final follow-up at 6 months. Conclusions: Although HD yielded more rapid improvement, the 3 injection methods for primary frozen shoulder resulted in similar clinical improvement in the final follow-up at 6 months.
AB - Background: The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the efficacy of 3 injection methods, intra-articular injection, subacromial injection, and hydrodilatation (HD), in the treatment of primary frozen shoulder. Methods: Patients with primary frozen shoulder were randomized to undergo intra-articular injection (n = 29), subacromial injection (n = 29), or HD (n = 28). Evaluations using a visual analog scale for pain, Simple Shoulder Test, Constant score, and passive range of shoulder motion were completed before treatment and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment. Results: Among the 3 injection methods for primary frozen shoulder, HD resulted in a greater range of motion in forward flexion and external rotation, a lower visual analog scale score for pain after 1 month, and better outcomes for all functional scores after 1 month and 3 months of follow-up. However, there were no significant differences in any clinical outcomes among the 3 groups in the final follow-up at 6 months. Conclusions: Although HD yielded more rapid improvement, the 3 injection methods for primary frozen shoulder resulted in similar clinical improvement in the final follow-up at 6 months.
KW - Hydrodilatation
KW - Injection method
KW - Intra-articular injection
KW - Primary frozen shoulder
KW - Stiff shoulder
KW - Subacromial injection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959102482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 26927433
AN - SCOPUS:84959102482
SN - 1058-2746
VL - 25
SP - 376
EP - 383
JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
IS - 3
ER -