TY - JOUR
T1 - Locational Role Analysis of Energy Storage Systems Based on Optimal Capacity Needs and Operations under High Penetration of Renewable Energy
AU - Park, Heejung
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the author.
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - As the need for energy storage systems (ESSs) capacity is increasing due to high accommodation of renewable resources, it is crucial to analyze in which location and for what purpose the ESSs are required to achieve the highest efficiency. Investors and system operators can place and operate the ESSs as expected based on this analysis. Therefore, this study assesses the specific roles of ESSs in a grid system based on their optimal capacity needs, locations, and operations. A long-term simulation model using mixed-integer programming is proposed to obtain these optimal solutions, such as ESS capacity and operational schedules for energy and reserves. Four-week operational simulations are performed for each month using data from the California Independent System Operator. ESSs are placed at sites with solar photovoltaic (PV) systems or wind farms, at baseload generator buses, and at load buses to verify the role of ESSs, depending on the locational differences. The detailed roles are analyzed from the aspects of flexible capacity supply, reserve deployments, time-shifting renewable and thermal energy generation, and costs. The results show that the ESSs on the baseload generation side provide flexibility by time-shifting baseload generation and turn on baseload generators, even when the net load is small. For instance, the required capacity of the flexible thermal generators, such as natural gas turbine generators, is about 3004 MW without the ESS operations in May. When 450 MW ESSs colocated with solar PVs are operated, the required flexible capacity of the thermal generators is lowered to 2404 MW. Moreover, ESSs are highly utilized as a downward reserve provider, although their costs for reserves are higher than thermal generators.
AB - As the need for energy storage systems (ESSs) capacity is increasing due to high accommodation of renewable resources, it is crucial to analyze in which location and for what purpose the ESSs are required to achieve the highest efficiency. Investors and system operators can place and operate the ESSs as expected based on this analysis. Therefore, this study assesses the specific roles of ESSs in a grid system based on their optimal capacity needs, locations, and operations. A long-term simulation model using mixed-integer programming is proposed to obtain these optimal solutions, such as ESS capacity and operational schedules for energy and reserves. Four-week operational simulations are performed for each month using data from the California Independent System Operator. ESSs are placed at sites with solar photovoltaic (PV) systems or wind farms, at baseload generator buses, and at load buses to verify the role of ESSs, depending on the locational differences. The detailed roles are analyzed from the aspects of flexible capacity supply, reserve deployments, time-shifting renewable and thermal energy generation, and costs. The results show that the ESSs on the baseload generation side provide flexibility by time-shifting baseload generation and turn on baseload generators, even when the net load is small. For instance, the required capacity of the flexible thermal generators, such as natural gas turbine generators, is about 3004 MW without the ESS operations in May. When 450 MW ESSs colocated with solar PVs are operated, the required flexible capacity of the thermal generators is lowered to 2404 MW. Moreover, ESSs are highly utilized as a downward reserve provider, although their costs for reserves are higher than thermal generators.
KW - baseload generation
KW - energy storage system
KW - flexible generation capacity
KW - renewable energy
KW - storage capacity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184701427&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/en17030743
DO - 10.3390/en17030743
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85184701427
SN - 1996-1073
VL - 17
JO - Energies
JF - Energies
IS - 3
M1 - 743
ER -