Long-Term Prognosis of Alopecia Totalis and Alopecia Universalis: A Longitudinal Study with More than 10 Years of Follow-Up: Better than Reported

Yong Hyun Jang, Nam Soo Hong, Sun Young Moon, Dong Hyuk Eun, Won Kee Lee, Seong Geun Chi, Jun Young Kim, Weon Ju Lee, Seok Jong Lee, Do Won Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: In alopecia totalis (AT) and alopecia universalis (AU), the chance of full hair regrowth is known to be less than 10%. However, this information is based on a few older studies conducted in the 1950s and 1960s. Objective: We investigated the current long-term prognosis of individuals with AT/AU. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed in patients with AT/AU between 1994 and 2005. Outcome data were collected by reviewing outpatient clinical files or by phone interviews. Finally, the long-term assessment of 70 patients with valid outcome data was performed. Results: Twelve out of 70 patients with AT/AU (17.1%) had complete hair regrowth. Five out of 24 patients with AT (20.8%) showed complete hair regrowth, and 7 of 46 patients with AU (15.2%) achieved complete regrowth. Seventeen out of 70 patients with AT/AU (24.2%) reported hair regrowth greater than or equal to 90%. Thirty patients with AU (65.2%) remained in an alopecic state without improvement, while 5 patients with AT (20.8%) showed no hair regrowth. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the long-term prognosis of AT/AU is more favorable than previously thought. However, the clinical burden of AT/AU is still substantial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)250-256
Number of pages7
JournalDermatology
Volume233
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2017

Keywords

  • Alopecia areata
  • Alopecia totalis
  • Alopecia universalis
  • Long-term prognosis
  • Prognostic factors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-Term Prognosis of Alopecia Totalis and Alopecia Universalis: A Longitudinal Study with More than 10 Years of Follow-Up: Better than Reported'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this