Longitudinal Study of Bone Height Change between Two Approaches for Sinus Floor Elevation

Jun Hyeong Park, Yong Gun Kim, Jo Young Suh, Du Hyeong Lee, Jin Wook Kim, Jae Mok Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term maintenance of each approach of sinus elevation, the crestal approach and lateral approach, by comparing the radiographic results of each technique. Materials and Methods: In total, 103 patients who had undergone an implant procedure with either the crestal approach or lateral approach method applied to their maxillary molar edentulous area were included. Using orthopantomographs, the radiographic changes were consistently evaluated over 3 years after the procedure (immediately after procedure and 1 year, 2 years and 3 years after implant placement) Results: The radiographic evaluation after 3 years of implantation with sinus elevation showed a significant amount of bone formation (8.07 mm for crestal approach and 12.00 mm for lateral approach method). The largest amount of grafted height loss occurred during the 1 year, but the resorption was minimal (0.98 mm for crestal approach and 0.95 mm for lateral approach method) over the entire 3 years. Conclusions: Although the lateral approach showed more bone growth, the amount of bone resorption was similar to that of the crestal approach. Both methods showed the highest amount of bone resorption in the first year, and the amount of change thereafter was insignificant. It is judged that both methods can be used according to the situation to help implant placement.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1132
JournalMedicina (Lithuania)
Volume59
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • bone loss
  • dental implant
  • maxillary sinus elevation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Longitudinal Study of Bone Height Change between Two Approaches for Sinus Floor Elevation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this