TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring STEM Instructors’ Learning of and Growth in Inclusive Teaching
T2 - Development and Evaluation of the STEM Faculty Inclusive Teaching Survey (FITS)
AU - Johnson-Ojeda, Vanessa
AU - Hill, Lucas B.
AU - Shin, Suyeong
AU - York, Alessandra M.
AU - Frey, Regina F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 V. Johnson-Ojeda et al.
PY - 2025/3/1
Y1 - 2025/3/1
N2 - There is a growing emphasis for professional development programs that teach instructors about inclusive Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) practices and the impact of instructor and student identities on these practices. As instructors implement these practices, there is a need for instructors, departments, and faculty developers to measure instructor progress and to help identify next steps in improving inclusive STEM teaching. This study describes the development of the Faculty Inclusive Teaching Survey (FITS) using scale-development theory, frameworks using Clarke and Hollingsworth’s interconnected model of professional growth and Dewsbury’s Deep Teaching model, and higher-education STEM, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and professional development literature. Using data of three cohorts from an online national inclusive STEM teaching program, exploratory factor and confirmatory factor analyses and invariance measurements were conducted to evaluate the initial internal structure of the FITS, comprising four measures: Awareness and Impact of Iden-tity, Confidence in Inclusive Teaching, Reflection on Inclusive Teaching, and Likelihood to Implement Inclusive Teaching. Our results provide initial evidence that the FITS could be used as one of the measurement approaches for instructor feedback and growth to support multidimensional and iterative learning about inclusive teaching in higher edu-cation. Implications and suggestions for practical use and future research are provided.
AB - There is a growing emphasis for professional development programs that teach instructors about inclusive Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) practices and the impact of instructor and student identities on these practices. As instructors implement these practices, there is a need for instructors, departments, and faculty developers to measure instructor progress and to help identify next steps in improving inclusive STEM teaching. This study describes the development of the Faculty Inclusive Teaching Survey (FITS) using scale-development theory, frameworks using Clarke and Hollingsworth’s interconnected model of professional growth and Dewsbury’s Deep Teaching model, and higher-education STEM, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and professional development literature. Using data of three cohorts from an online national inclusive STEM teaching program, exploratory factor and confirmatory factor analyses and invariance measurements were conducted to evaluate the initial internal structure of the FITS, comprising four measures: Awareness and Impact of Iden-tity, Confidence in Inclusive Teaching, Reflection on Inclusive Teaching, and Likelihood to Implement Inclusive Teaching. Our results provide initial evidence that the FITS could be used as one of the measurement approaches for instructor feedback and growth to support multidimensional and iterative learning about inclusive teaching in higher edu-cation. Implications and suggestions for practical use and future research are provided.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217357696&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1187/cbe.24-01-0016
DO - 10.1187/cbe.24-01-0016
M3 - Article
C2 - 39879127
AN - SCOPUS:85217357696
SN - 1931-7913
VL - 24
JO - CBE Life Sciences Education
JF - CBE Life Sciences Education
IS - 1
M1 - ar13
ER -