TY - JOUR
T1 - Median Lingual Foramen, a new midmandibular cephalometric landmark
AU - Vandekerckhove, David
AU - Deibel, Dionne
AU - Vinayahalingam, Shankeeth
AU - Claeys, Gilles
AU - Kwon, Tae Geon
AU - Bergé, Stefaan
AU - Xi, Tong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Purpose: In asymmetrical mandibles, it is often challenging to identify the mandibular midline. The median lingual foramen (MLF) is located at the midline of the anterior mandible. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reproducibility of identifying the MLF compared to conventional landmarks on cone beam computed tomography's (CBCT's) to mark the mandibular midline. Material and Methods: Ten symmetrical class II, 10 symmetrical class III, ten asymmetrical class II and 10 asymmetrical class III patients were included. On CBCTs, the cephalometric landmarks menton, pogonion, genial tubercle and MLF were identified twice by two observers. Results: A high intra- and interobserver reproducibility was found for all landmarks, the highest being the MLF. The gain in accuracy is 0.998 mm, 0.824 mm and 0.361 mm compared to pogonion, genial tubercle and menton, respectively (P-value <.05). Conclusion: MLF is a reliable and reproducible landmark to indicate the midline of the mandible, particularly in Class II asymmetric mandibles.
AB - Purpose: In asymmetrical mandibles, it is often challenging to identify the mandibular midline. The median lingual foramen (MLF) is located at the midline of the anterior mandible. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reproducibility of identifying the MLF compared to conventional landmarks on cone beam computed tomography's (CBCT's) to mark the mandibular midline. Material and Methods: Ten symmetrical class II, 10 symmetrical class III, ten asymmetrical class II and 10 asymmetrical class III patients were included. On CBCTs, the cephalometric landmarks menton, pogonion, genial tubercle and MLF were identified twice by two observers. Results: A high intra- and interobserver reproducibility was found for all landmarks, the highest being the MLF. The gain in accuracy is 0.998 mm, 0.824 mm and 0.361 mm compared to pogonion, genial tubercle and menton, respectively (P-value <.05). Conclusion: MLF is a reliable and reproducible landmark to indicate the midline of the mandible, particularly in Class II asymmetric mandibles.
KW - asymmetric
KW - cephalometric landmark
KW - mandible
KW - orthognathic surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081224585&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ocr.12372
DO - 10.1111/ocr.12372
M3 - Article
C2 - 32096318
AN - SCOPUS:85081224585
SN - 1601-6335
VL - 23
SP - 357
EP - 361
JO - Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
JF - Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
IS - 3
ER -