Mid-term outcomes of endovascular repair for traumatic thoracic aortic injury: a single-center experience

Shin Ah Son, Hanna Jung, Joon Yong Cho, Tak Hyuk Oh, Young Woo Do, Kyoung Hoon Lim, Gun Jik Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for traumatic thoracic aortic injury (TTAI) reports short-term benefits. However, long-term durability and the need of reintervention remain unclear. Here, we determined mid-term outcome of TEVAR for TTAI and investigated the influence of the length of proximal landing zone on aorta. Methods: Between October 2009 and February 2018, 69 patients diagnosed TTAI and 42 included patients underwent TEVAR. Patients were divided into two groups by the length of proximal landing zone; ≤ 20 mm and > 20 mm. The primary endpoint was success and survival rate, and the secondary endpoint was the increase of aorta size and the need of reintervention. Results: The mean follow-up period was 47.9 ± 29.6 months and 100% success rate. No endoleaks or additional reinterventions during the follow-up period. The cumulative survival of all-cause death was 90.5 ± 2.3%, 85.7 ± 4.1% and 61.7 ± 8.4% at 1, 5 and 7 years, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the increase of aorta size due to the length of the proximal landing zone (p = 0.65). Conclusion: In selective TTAI patients for TEVAR, the length of proximal landing zone did not considerably influence the aorta size or needed further reintervention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)965-972
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2019

Keywords

  • Aorta
  • Endovascular procedure
  • Stents
  • Trauma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mid-term outcomes of endovascular repair for traumatic thoracic aortic injury: a single-center experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this