TY - JOUR
T1 - Nonsurgical Removal of Improvised Nasogastric Tubes Entrapped in the Urethra in Two Male Dogs
AU - Seo, Minjun
AU - Lee, Sang Kwon
AU - Bae, Seulgi
AU - Mann, F. A.
AU - Koo, Yoonhoi
AU - Kim, Dongseok
AU - Jang, Min
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Animal Hospital Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - In two castrated male dogs, entrapment of a nasogastric feeding tube, which had been used as an improvised urethral catheter, occurred during intermittent urethral catheterization. In both cases, multiple failed attempts to remove the catheter raised concerns about catheter entrapment, which was subsequently confirmed via abdominal radiography. To facilitate removal, both dogs were placed under deep sedation using IV butorphanol (0.3 mg/kg) and propofol titrated to effect. A retrograde over-the-needle catheter was inserted alongside the entrapped nasogastric tube, and the urethral orifice was manually narrowed as much as possible. While applying rectal compression of the urethra, saline was infused through the over-the-needle catheter to dilate the urethra, allowing for the gentle extraction of the entrapped tube. Following entrapped tube removal, no urethral trauma or adverse effects were observed. These cases highlight the risks associated with using nonstandard materials, such as nasogastric feeding tubes, for urethral catheterization and introduces a novel nonsurgical technique for managing urethral catheter entrapment in veterinary practice.
AB - In two castrated male dogs, entrapment of a nasogastric feeding tube, which had been used as an improvised urethral catheter, occurred during intermittent urethral catheterization. In both cases, multiple failed attempts to remove the catheter raised concerns about catheter entrapment, which was subsequently confirmed via abdominal radiography. To facilitate removal, both dogs were placed under deep sedation using IV butorphanol (0.3 mg/kg) and propofol titrated to effect. A retrograde over-the-needle catheter was inserted alongside the entrapped nasogastric tube, and the urethral orifice was manually narrowed as much as possible. While applying rectal compression of the urethra, saline was infused through the over-the-needle catheter to dilate the urethra, allowing for the gentle extraction of the entrapped tube. Following entrapped tube removal, no urethral trauma or adverse effects were observed. These cases highlight the risks associated with using nonstandard materials, such as nasogastric feeding tubes, for urethral catheterization and introduces a novel nonsurgical technique for managing urethral catheter entrapment in veterinary practice.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008677112
U2 - 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7484
DO - 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7484
M3 - Article
C2 - 40531084
AN - SCOPUS:105008677112
SN - 0587-2871
VL - 61
SP - 111
EP - 116
JO - Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association
JF - Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association
IS - 4
ER -