TY - JOUR
T1 - Objective characterization of rain microphysics
T2 - Validating a scheme suitable for weather and climate models
AU - Tapiador, Francisco J.
AU - Berne, A.
AU - Raupach, T.
AU - Navarro, A.
AU - Lee, G.
AU - Haddad, Z. S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Meteorological Society.
PY - 2018/6/1
Y1 - 2018/6/1
N2 - Improving the atmospheric component of hydrological models is beneficial for applications such as water resources assessment and hydropower operations. Within this goal, precise characterization of rain microphysics is key for climate and weather modeling, and thus for hydrometeorological applications. Such characterization can be achieved by analyzing the evolution in time of the particle size distribution (PSD) of hydrometeors, which can be measured at ground using disdrometers for validation. The estimation, however, depends on the choice of the PSD form (the shape) and on the parameters to define the exact shape. In the case of modeling rain microphysics, two approaches compete: the use of the number concentration of drops decoupled from the shape of the distribution (the [NT, E(D), E(D2)] and the (NT, E(D), E[log(D)]) models), and the (N0, Λ, μ) model that embeds in N0 both the shape of the distribution and the number concentration of drops. Here we use a comprehensive dataset of disdrometer measurements to show that the NT-based approaches allow a more precise characterization of the drop size distribution (DSD) and also a physically based modeling of the microphysical processes of rain since NT is analytically independent of the shape of the DSD (parameterized by E(D), and E(D2) or E[log(D)]). The implication is that numerical models would benefit from decoupling the number of drops from the shape of distribution in their modules of precipitation microphysics in order to improve outputs that eventually feed hydrological models.
AB - Improving the atmospheric component of hydrological models is beneficial for applications such as water resources assessment and hydropower operations. Within this goal, precise characterization of rain microphysics is key for climate and weather modeling, and thus for hydrometeorological applications. Such characterization can be achieved by analyzing the evolution in time of the particle size distribution (PSD) of hydrometeors, which can be measured at ground using disdrometers for validation. The estimation, however, depends on the choice of the PSD form (the shape) and on the parameters to define the exact shape. In the case of modeling rain microphysics, two approaches compete: the use of the number concentration of drops decoupled from the shape of the distribution (the [NT, E(D), E(D2)] and the (NT, E(D), E[log(D)]) models), and the (N0, Λ, μ) model that embeds in N0 both the shape of the distribution and the number concentration of drops. Here we use a comprehensive dataset of disdrometer measurements to show that the NT-based approaches allow a more precise characterization of the drop size distribution (DSD) and also a physically based modeling of the microphysical processes of rain since NT is analytically independent of the shape of the DSD (parameterized by E(D), and E(D2) or E[log(D)]). The implication is that numerical models would benefit from decoupling the number of drops from the shape of distribution in their modules of precipitation microphysics in order to improve outputs that eventually feed hydrological models.
KW - Climate models
KW - General circulation models
KW - Numerical weather prediction/forecasting
KW - Parameterization
KW - Precipitation
KW - Regional models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049513444&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1175/JHM-D-17-0154.1
DO - 10.1175/JHM-D-17-0154.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85049513444
SN - 1525-755X
VL - 19
SP - 929
EP - 946
JO - Journal of Hydrometeorology
JF - Journal of Hydrometeorology
IS - 6
ER -