TY - JOUR
T1 - On-Site vs. laboratorial implementation of camera self-calibration for UAV photogrammetry
AU - Han, Soohee
AU - Park, Jinhwan
AU - Lee, Wonhee
PY - 2016/8
Y1 - 2016/8
N2 - This study investigates two camera self-calibration approaches, on-site self-calibration and laboratorial self-calibration, both of which are based on self-calibration theory and implemented by using a commercial photogrammetric solution, Agisoft PhotoScan. On-site self-calibration implements camera self-calibration and aerial triangulation by using the same aerial photos. Laboratorial self-calibration implements camera selfcalibration by using photos captured onto a patterned target displayed on a digital panel, then conducts aerial triangulation by using the aerial photos. Aerial photos are captured by an unmanned aerial vehicle, and target photos are captured onto a 27in LCD monitor and a 47in LCD TV in two experiments. Calibration parameters are estimated by the two approaches and errors of aerial triangulation are analyzed. Results reveal that on-site self-calibration excels laboratorial self-calibration in terms of vertical accuracy. By contrast, laboratorial selfcalibration obtains better horizontal accuracy if photos are captured at a greater distance from the target by using a larger display panel.
AB - This study investigates two camera self-calibration approaches, on-site self-calibration and laboratorial self-calibration, both of which are based on self-calibration theory and implemented by using a commercial photogrammetric solution, Agisoft PhotoScan. On-site self-calibration implements camera self-calibration and aerial triangulation by using the same aerial photos. Laboratorial self-calibration implements camera selfcalibration by using photos captured onto a patterned target displayed on a digital panel, then conducts aerial triangulation by using the aerial photos. Aerial photos are captured by an unmanned aerial vehicle, and target photos are captured onto a 27in LCD monitor and a 47in LCD TV in two experiments. Calibration parameters are estimated by the two approaches and errors of aerial triangulation are analyzed. Results reveal that on-site self-calibration excels laboratorial self-calibration in terms of vertical accuracy. By contrast, laboratorial selfcalibration obtains better horizontal accuracy if photos are captured at a greater distance from the target by using a larger display panel.
KW - Aerial photogrammetry
KW - Aerial triangulation
KW - Self-calibration
KW - UAV
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988935533&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7848/ksgpc.2016.34.4.349
DO - 10.7848/ksgpc.2016.34.4.349
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84988935533
SN - 1598-4850
VL - 34
SP - 349
EP - 356
JO - Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography
JF - Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography
IS - 4
ER -