Performance of Back-Trajectory Statistical Methods and Inverse Modeling Method in Locating Emission Sources

Xuekun Fang, Takuya Saito, Sunyoung Park, Shanlan Li, Yoko Yokouchi, Ronald G. Prinn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Back-trajectory statistical methods, for example, potential source contribution functions (PSCF) and concentration-weighted trajectory (CWT) methods, have been widely used in previous studies to locate emission source regions of air pollutants or greenhouse gases. Inverse modeling methods have been developed and used in an increasing number of applications. To this date, there are no comparisons of performance between back-trajectory statistical and inverse modeling methods. This study evaluates the performance of PSCF, CWT, and inverse modeling methods by taking advantage of precisely known locations of trifluoromethane (CHF3; HFC-23) sources. Results show poor performance of the PSCF and CWT methods and good performance of the inverse modeling method. This study suggests that in studies with the purpose of locating emission source regions the PSCF and CWT methods should be applied with caution in future studies and that the inverse modeling method is encouraged to be used much more widely.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)843-851
Number of pages9
JournalACS Earth and Space Chemistry
Volume2
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 16 Aug 2018

Keywords

  • emission source
  • FLEXPART
  • HYSPLIT
  • inverse modeling
  • source attribution
  • trajectory
  • Trajectory statistical methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance of Back-Trajectory Statistical Methods and Inverse Modeling Method in Locating Emission Sources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this