TY - JOUR
T1 - Plant-based burger patties
T2 - effect of chickpea and textured vegetable protein concentrations on their properties and in vitro digestibility
AU - Kea, Theavy
AU - Hun, Sreymom
AU - Mazumder, Md Anisur Rahman
AU - Kingwascharapong, Passakorn
AU - Sai-Ut, Samart
AU - Pongsetkul, Jaksuma
AU - Jung, Young Hoon
AU - Zhang, Wanli
AU - Rawdkuen, Saroat
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - A lot of health-conscious consumers seek alternatives to animal protein that have similar texture, appearance, and flavor. However, further research and development still needs to identify non-meat alternatives. The objective of the research was to develop plant-based burger patties (PBP) with different ratios of chickpea flour (CF) and textured vegetable protein (TVP). The PBP was prepared using different concentrations of CF and TVP (25:75, 50:50, and 75:25, w/w, named T1, T2, and T3, respectively). Physico-chemical, textural and protein qualities of PBP were determined. The PBP had significantly lower amounts of protein (13.21 to 17.10 %) compared to beef burger patties (BBP, 20.13 %). Increasing the CF decreased the water activity. Samples T1 and T2 show similar L*-values, while T3 shows a darker L*-value than BBP. The highest cooking loss was observed in PBP prepared from 50 % CF & 50 % TVP (T2) and 25 % CF and 75 % TVP (T3). The PBP prepared from 25 % CF and 75 % TVP (T1) had comparable textural properties with BBP. Protein patterns showed major protein bands in PBPs with molecular weight ranging between 20–75 kDa under reducing conditions. Sample prepared from 25 % CF and 75 % TVP (T1) showed improved in-vitro protein digestibility in simulated gastric (pH 1.5–2) and intestinal fluid (pH 6–8), suggesting the absence of the protein band after 180 min of digestion. It is suggested that 25 % chickpea flour and 75 % TVP are optimum for making PBP based on composition and protein quality.
AB - A lot of health-conscious consumers seek alternatives to animal protein that have similar texture, appearance, and flavor. However, further research and development still needs to identify non-meat alternatives. The objective of the research was to develop plant-based burger patties (PBP) with different ratios of chickpea flour (CF) and textured vegetable protein (TVP). The PBP was prepared using different concentrations of CF and TVP (25:75, 50:50, and 75:25, w/w, named T1, T2, and T3, respectively). Physico-chemical, textural and protein qualities of PBP were determined. The PBP had significantly lower amounts of protein (13.21 to 17.10 %) compared to beef burger patties (BBP, 20.13 %). Increasing the CF decreased the water activity. Samples T1 and T2 show similar L*-values, while T3 shows a darker L*-value than BBP. The highest cooking loss was observed in PBP prepared from 50 % CF & 50 % TVP (T2) and 25 % CF and 75 % TVP (T3). The PBP prepared from 25 % CF and 75 % TVP (T1) had comparable textural properties with BBP. Protein patterns showed major protein bands in PBPs with molecular weight ranging between 20–75 kDa under reducing conditions. Sample prepared from 25 % CF and 75 % TVP (T1) showed improved in-vitro protein digestibility in simulated gastric (pH 1.5–2) and intestinal fluid (pH 6–8), suggesting the absence of the protein band after 180 min of digestion. It is suggested that 25 % chickpea flour and 75 % TVP are optimum for making PBP based on composition and protein quality.
KW - Burger patty
KW - Chickpea
KW - Plant-based
KW - Protein quality
KW - Texture vegetable protein
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013643515
U2 - 10.1016/j.afres.2025.101270
DO - 10.1016/j.afres.2025.101270
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105013643515
SN - 2772-5022
VL - 5
JO - Applied Food Research
JF - Applied Food Research
IS - 2
M1 - 101270
ER -