TY - JOUR
T1 - Priority Considerations in the Space of a Neighborhood Facility Using Post Occupancy Evaluation Based on Importance-performance Analysis-Focused on 341 Facilities in Daegu-
AU - Kim, Hoon
AU - Choo, Seung Yeon
AU - Woo, So Young
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Architectural Institute of Korea.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - This study aims to derive and prioritize a core evaluation index that should be considered when planning or evaluating individual spaces constituting neighborhood living facilities. There were 341 neighborhood facilities examined regarding specific planning methods or evaluation indicators that were not clearly confirmed in many design cases. Based on the survey response data, the importance-performance analysis (IPA) for each space was conducted to confirm the priority of detailed planning or evaluation index for each space; a one-way ANOVA was then performed to derive a significant index. After comparing data in both IPA and one-way ANOVA, a core evaluation index of a neighborhood facility was derived. Upon analysis, it revealed IPA results for five categories and the lower 60 detailed index was collected through the post occupancy evaluation (POE). By category, the rank of paired sample was determined in the order of indoor common space, appearance, rental space, interior environment or equipment, and external common space. Derived through one-way ANOVA, there were 18 items that were not statistically significant. Finally, by comparing the paired sample t, matrix of IPA and the significance index of ANOVA, 30 key evaluation indices were derived.
AB - This study aims to derive and prioritize a core evaluation index that should be considered when planning or evaluating individual spaces constituting neighborhood living facilities. There were 341 neighborhood facilities examined regarding specific planning methods or evaluation indicators that were not clearly confirmed in many design cases. Based on the survey response data, the importance-performance analysis (IPA) for each space was conducted to confirm the priority of detailed planning or evaluation index for each space; a one-way ANOVA was then performed to derive a significant index. After comparing data in both IPA and one-way ANOVA, a core evaluation index of a neighborhood facility was derived. Upon analysis, it revealed IPA results for five categories and the lower 60 detailed index was collected through the post occupancy evaluation (POE). By category, the rank of paired sample was determined in the order of indoor common space, appearance, rental space, interior environment or equipment, and external common space. Derived through one-way ANOVA, there were 18 items that were not statistically significant. Finally, by comparing the paired sample t, matrix of IPA and the significance index of ANOVA, 30 key evaluation indices were derived.
KW - Core Evaluation Index
KW - Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA)
KW - Neighborhood Facility
KW - Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145219954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5659/JAIK.2022.38.12.35
DO - 10.5659/JAIK.2022.38.12.35
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85145219954
SN - 2733-6239
VL - 38
SP - 35
EP - 46
JO - Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea
JF - Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea
IS - 12
ER -