TY - JOUR
T1 - Single-port versus multiport robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
T2 - initial experiences by case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes
AU - Jeong, Min Hye
AU - Kim, Hye Jin
AU - Choi, Gyu Seog
AU - Song, Seung Ho
AU - Park, Jun Seok
AU - Park, Soo Yeun
AU - Lee, Sung Min
AU - Na, Dong Hee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2023, the Korean Surgical Society.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Purpose: The da Vinci single-port (SP) system has been used in various surgical fields, including colorectal surgery. However, limited experience has been reported on its safety and feasibility. This study aims to evaluate the short-term outcomes of SP robotic surgery for the treatment of rectal cancer compared with multiport (MP) robotic surgery. Methods: Rectal cancer patients who underwent curative resection in 2020 were reviewed. A total of 43 patients underwent robotic total mesorectal excision (TME), of which 26 (13 in each group, SPTME vs. MPTME) were included in the case-matched cohort for analysis. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes and pathological results were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Median tumor height was similar between the 2 groups (SPTME vs. MPTME: 5.9 cm [range, 2.2–9.6 cm] vs. 6.7 cm [range, 3.4–10.0 cm], P = 0.578). Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was equally performed (38.5%). The median estimated blood loss was less (20.0 mL [range, 5.0–20.0 mL] vs. 30.0 mL [range, 20.0–30.0 mL], P = 0.020) and the median hospital stay was shorter (7 days [range, 6–8 days] vs. 8 days [range, 7–9 days], P = 0.055) in the SPTME group. Postoperative complications did not differ (SPTME vs. MPTME: 7.7% vs. 23.1%, P = 0.587). One patient in the SPTME group and 3 in the MPTME group experienced anastomotic leakage. Conclusion: SP robotic TME showed perioperative outcomes similar to MP robotic TME. The SP robotic system can be considered a surgical option for the treatment of rectal cancer. Further prospective randomized trials with larger cohorts are required.
AB - Purpose: The da Vinci single-port (SP) system has been used in various surgical fields, including colorectal surgery. However, limited experience has been reported on its safety and feasibility. This study aims to evaluate the short-term outcomes of SP robotic surgery for the treatment of rectal cancer compared with multiport (MP) robotic surgery. Methods: Rectal cancer patients who underwent curative resection in 2020 were reviewed. A total of 43 patients underwent robotic total mesorectal excision (TME), of which 26 (13 in each group, SPTME vs. MPTME) were included in the case-matched cohort for analysis. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes and pathological results were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Median tumor height was similar between the 2 groups (SPTME vs. MPTME: 5.9 cm [range, 2.2–9.6 cm] vs. 6.7 cm [range, 3.4–10.0 cm], P = 0.578). Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was equally performed (38.5%). The median estimated blood loss was less (20.0 mL [range, 5.0–20.0 mL] vs. 30.0 mL [range, 20.0–30.0 mL], P = 0.020) and the median hospital stay was shorter (7 days [range, 6–8 days] vs. 8 days [range, 7–9 days], P = 0.055) in the SPTME group. Postoperative complications did not differ (SPTME vs. MPTME: 7.7% vs. 23.1%, P = 0.587). One patient in the SPTME group and 3 in the MPTME group experienced anastomotic leakage. Conclusion: SP robotic TME showed perioperative outcomes similar to MP robotic TME. The SP robotic system can be considered a surgical option for the treatment of rectal cancer. Further prospective randomized trials with larger cohorts are required.
KW - Rectal neoplasms
KW - Robotic surgical procedures
KW - Single-port robotic surgery
KW - Total mesorectal excision
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170224786&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4174/astr.2023.105.2.99
DO - 10.4174/astr.2023.105.2.99
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85170224786
SN - 2288-6575
VL - 105
SP - 99
EP - 106
JO - Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
JF - Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
IS - 2
ER -
