TY - JOUR
T1 - Solvent-free acetylation of CNFS and CMFS using different catalysts
AU - Park, Seongsu
AU - Park, Byung Dae
AU - Jung, Young Hoon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Editura Academiei Romane. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Nanocellulose has several advantages, including hydrophilicity, low density, high strength property, and large specific-surface area. However, its hydrophilicity becomes a problem when it comes in contact with a polymer matrix in nanocomposites. Therefore, the transformation of hydrophilicity into hydrophobicity through chemical modifications is important. This study focused on the impacts of two solvent-free acetylation methods using iodine (Method 1) and sulfuric acid (Method 2) as catalysts. Moreover, herein, the characteristics of acetylated cellulose nanofibrils (A-CNFs) and cellulose microfibrils (A-CMFs) produced via an aqueous counter collision (ACC) are compared. The degree of substitution (DS) of acetylated samples increased with the reaction time. Furthermore, the DS of Method 2 was higher than that of Method 1. After acetylation, the X-ray diffraction patterns of the samples were semicrystalline and amorphous owing to the destruction of crystalline cellulose. Moreover, the crystallinity of all acetylated samples decreased. Excluding a few cases of Method 2, the thermal stability increased after acetylation. Excluding the CMFs treated with Method 2, the contact angle increased with the reaction time. This indicates that the samples were transformed to exhibit hydrophobic surfaces. In addition, the cases of Method 1 exhibited higher crystallinity, thermal stability, and wettability than those of Method 2.
AB - Nanocellulose has several advantages, including hydrophilicity, low density, high strength property, and large specific-surface area. However, its hydrophilicity becomes a problem when it comes in contact with a polymer matrix in nanocomposites. Therefore, the transformation of hydrophilicity into hydrophobicity through chemical modifications is important. This study focused on the impacts of two solvent-free acetylation methods using iodine (Method 1) and sulfuric acid (Method 2) as catalysts. Moreover, herein, the characteristics of acetylated cellulose nanofibrils (A-CNFs) and cellulose microfibrils (A-CMFs) produced via an aqueous counter collision (ACC) are compared. The degree of substitution (DS) of acetylated samples increased with the reaction time. Furthermore, the DS of Method 2 was higher than that of Method 1. After acetylation, the X-ray diffraction patterns of the samples were semicrystalline and amorphous owing to the destruction of crystalline cellulose. Moreover, the crystallinity of all acetylated samples decreased. Excluding a few cases of Method 2, the thermal stability increased after acetylation. Excluding the CMFs treated with Method 2, the contact angle increased with the reaction time. This indicates that the samples were transformed to exhibit hydrophobic surfaces. In addition, the cases of Method 1 exhibited higher crystallinity, thermal stability, and wettability than those of Method 2.
KW - CMFs
KW - CNFs
KW - Solvent-free acetylation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097580255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.35812/CELLULOSECHEMTECHNOL.2020.54.83
DO - 10.35812/CELLULOSECHEMTECHNOL.2020.54.83
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85097580255
SN - 0576-9787
VL - 54
SP - 845
EP - 855
JO - Cellulose Chemistry and Technology
JF - Cellulose Chemistry and Technology
IS - 9-10
ER -