TY - JOUR
T1 - Stepwise Improvement of Surgical Quality in Robotic Lateral Pelvic Node Dissection
T2 - Lessons from 100 Consecutive Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
AU - Kim, Hye Jin
AU - Choi, Gyu Seog
AU - Park, Jun Seok
AU - Park, Soo Yeun
AU - Lee, Sung Min
AU - Song, Seung Ho
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/4/1
Y1 - 2022/4/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Lateral pelvic node dissection has significant technical difficulty and a high incidence of surgical morbidity. A steep learning curve is anticipated in performing lateral pelvic node dissection. However, no study has previously analyzed the learning curve and surgical skill acquisition for this complex procedure. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the learning process for performing robotic total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic node dissection in patients with rectal cancer. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. SETTING: This study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center. PATIENTS: A total of 100 patients who underwent robotic total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic node dissection between 2011 and 2017 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A cumulative sum analysis was calculated based on the number of unilateral retrieved lateral pelvic nodes. Operative time, estimated bloodloss, lateral pelvic node metastatic rate, postoperative morbidities, and local recurrence were also analyzed. RESULTS: Cumulative sum modeling suggested 4 learning phases: learning I (33 patients), learning II (19 patients), consolidation (30 patients), and competence (18 patients). In the consolidation and competence phases, we adopted fluorescence imaging and standardized the surgical procedure on the basis of anatomical planes. The competence phase had the greatest number of unilateral retrieved lateral pelvic nodes (12.8 vs 4.9, 8.2, and 10.4; p < 0.001). Urinary complications, including urinary retention and postoperative α-blocker usage, were more frequently observed in learning phase I than in the competence phase (39.4% vs 16.7%, p = 0.034). During the median follow-up of 44.2 months, local recurrence in the pelvic sidewall was observed in 4 patients from learning phase I and in 1 patient from learning phase II. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design. CONCLUSION: Completeness of the lateral pelvic node dissection procedure increased with the surgeon's experience and as new imaging systems and surgical technique standardization were implemented. Further studies are warranted to determine the oncologic outcomes associated with each phase.
AB - BACKGROUND: Lateral pelvic node dissection has significant technical difficulty and a high incidence of surgical morbidity. A steep learning curve is anticipated in performing lateral pelvic node dissection. However, no study has previously analyzed the learning curve and surgical skill acquisition for this complex procedure. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the learning process for performing robotic total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic node dissection in patients with rectal cancer. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. SETTING: This study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center. PATIENTS: A total of 100 patients who underwent robotic total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic node dissection between 2011 and 2017 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A cumulative sum analysis was calculated based on the number of unilateral retrieved lateral pelvic nodes. Operative time, estimated bloodloss, lateral pelvic node metastatic rate, postoperative morbidities, and local recurrence were also analyzed. RESULTS: Cumulative sum modeling suggested 4 learning phases: learning I (33 patients), learning II (19 patients), consolidation (30 patients), and competence (18 patients). In the consolidation and competence phases, we adopted fluorescence imaging and standardized the surgical procedure on the basis of anatomical planes. The competence phase had the greatest number of unilateral retrieved lateral pelvic nodes (12.8 vs 4.9, 8.2, and 10.4; p < 0.001). Urinary complications, including urinary retention and postoperative α-blocker usage, were more frequently observed in learning phase I than in the competence phase (39.4% vs 16.7%, p = 0.034). During the median follow-up of 44.2 months, local recurrence in the pelvic sidewall was observed in 4 patients from learning phase I and in 1 patient from learning phase II. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design. CONCLUSION: Completeness of the lateral pelvic node dissection procedure increased with the surgeon's experience and as new imaging systems and surgical technique standardization were implemented. Further studies are warranted to determine the oncologic outcomes associated with each phase.
KW - Lateral pelvic node dissection
KW - Learning curve
KW - Rectal cancer
KW - Robotic surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126389724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002329
DO - 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002329
M3 - Article
C2 - 34759242
AN - SCOPUS:85126389724
SN - 0012-3706
VL - 65
SP - 599
EP - 607
JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
IS - 4
ER -