Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of different matching methods on the accuracy of den-tofacial integration in stereophotogrammetry and smartphone face-scanning systems. The integra-tion was done (N = 30) with different matching areas (n = 10), including teeth image only (TO), perioral area without markers (PN) and with markers (PM). The positional accuracy of the inte-grated models was assessed by measuring the midline linear deviations and incisal line canting between the experimental groups and laser scanner-based reference standards. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests were used for statistical analyses (α = 0.05). The PM method exhibited the smallest linear deviations in both systems; while the highest deviations were found in the TO in stereophotogrammetry; and in PN in smartphone. For the incisal line canting; the canting degree was the lowest in the PM method; followed by that in the TO and the PN in both systems. Although stereophotogrammetry generally exhibited higher accuracy than the smartphone; the two systems demonstrated no significant difference when the perioral areas were used for matching. The use of perioral scans with markers enables accurate dentofacial image integration; however; cautions should be given on the accuracy of the perioral image obtained without the use of markers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 229 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-12 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jan 2021 |
Keywords
- Accuracy
- Dentofacial in-tegration
- Face scanners
- Intraoral scanners
- Perioral scans
- Skin markers
- Smartphone
- Stereophotogrammetry
- Three-dimensional face-scanning