The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery

Ho Jin Lee, Jin Wook Kim, So Young Choi, Chin Soo Kim, Tae Geon Kwon, Jun Youg Paeng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the usefulness of tracheostomy scoring system in the decision of postoperative airway management in oral cancer patients. Materials and methods: A total of 104 patients were reviewed in this retrospective study, who underwent radical resection with or without neck dissection and free flap reconstruction due to oral cancer. The patients were classified into three groups according to the timing of the extubation; extubated groups (n = 51), overnight intubation group (n = 45), and tracheostomy group (n = 8). Cameron’s score was used to evaluate the relation between the state of the patient’s airway and the type of the operation. Results: Tracheostomy was performed in eight patients (8/104, 7.7 %). A total of 22 patients (21.2 %) had more than 5 points of which 17 patients (77.3 %) did not have a tracheostomy and any postoperative emergency airway problems. The tracheostomy scores were significantly different among the three groups. Hospital stay showed a significant correlation with the tracheostomy score. Conclusions: The scoring system did not quite agree with the airway management of the authors’ clinic; however, it can be one of the clinical factors predicting the degree of the postoperative airway obstruction and surgical aggressiveness for recovery. The further studies are needed for clinically more reliable scoring systems.

Original languageEnglish
Article number19
JournalMaxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2015

Keywords

  • Nasotracheal intubation
  • Oral cancer
  • Scoring system
  • Tracheostomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this