TY - JOUR
T1 - The speed of adaptation is dependent on the load type during target reaching by intact human subjects
AU - Oh, Keonyoung
AU - Rymer, William Zev
AU - Choi, Junho
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - When lifting or moving a novel object, humans are routinely able to quickly characterize the nature of the unknown load and swiftly achieve the desired movement trajectory. It appears that both tactile and proprioceptive feedback systems help humans develop an accurate prediction of load properties and determine how associated limb segments behave during voluntary movements. While various types of limb movement information, such as position, velocity, acceleration, and manipulating forces, can be detected using human tactile and proprioceptive systems, we know little about how the central nervous system decodes these various types of movement data, and in which order or priority they are used when developing predictions of joint motion during novel object manipulation. In this study, we tested whether the ability to predict motion is different between position- (elastic), velocity- (viscous), and acceleration-dependent (inertial) loads imposed using a multiaxial haptic robot. Using this protocol, we can learn if the prediction of the motion model is optimized for one or more of these types of mechanical load. We examined ten neurologically intact subjects. Our key findings indicated that inertial and viscous loads showed the fastest adaptation speed, whereas elastic loads showed the slowest adaptation speed. Different speeds of adaptation were observed across different magnitudes of the load, suggesting that human capabilities for predicting joint motion and manipulating loads may vary systematically with different load types and load magnitudes. Our results imply that human capabilities for load manipulation seems to be most sensitive to and potentially optimized for inertial loads.
AB - When lifting or moving a novel object, humans are routinely able to quickly characterize the nature of the unknown load and swiftly achieve the desired movement trajectory. It appears that both tactile and proprioceptive feedback systems help humans develop an accurate prediction of load properties and determine how associated limb segments behave during voluntary movements. While various types of limb movement information, such as position, velocity, acceleration, and manipulating forces, can be detected using human tactile and proprioceptive systems, we know little about how the central nervous system decodes these various types of movement data, and in which order or priority they are used when developing predictions of joint motion during novel object manipulation. In this study, we tested whether the ability to predict motion is different between position- (elastic), velocity- (viscous), and acceleration-dependent (inertial) loads imposed using a multiaxial haptic robot. Using this protocol, we can learn if the prediction of the motion model is optimized for one or more of these types of mechanical load. We examined ten neurologically intact subjects. Our key findings indicated that inertial and viscous loads showed the fastest adaptation speed, whereas elastic loads showed the slowest adaptation speed. Different speeds of adaptation were observed across different magnitudes of the load, suggesting that human capabilities for predicting joint motion and manipulating loads may vary systematically with different load types and load magnitudes. Our results imply that human capabilities for load manipulation seems to be most sensitive to and potentially optimized for inertial loads.
KW - Haptic device
KW - Impedance
KW - Motor adaptation
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Stroke
KW - Target reaching
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112586247&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00221-021-06189-3
DO - 10.1007/s00221-021-06189-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 34401936
AN - SCOPUS:85112586247
SN - 0014-4819
VL - 239
SP - 3091
EP - 3104
JO - Experimental Brain Research
JF - Experimental Brain Research
IS - 10
ER -