TY - JOUR
T1 - Three liquid chromatographic methods for the analysis of aflatoxins in for different corn (Zea mays) matrices
AU - Ok, Hyun Ee
AU - Jung, Hyelee
AU - Lee, Sung Eun
AU - Peak, Ockjin
AU - Chun, Hyang Sook
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Liquid chromatographic analyses of aflatoxins (AFs) in corn, with post-column derivatization using a photochemical reactor for enhanced detection (PHRED) and a Kobra electrochemical cell system were compared with the pre-column derivatization method using trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). AFs in four different corn matrices were analyzed and validated in terms of the limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), linearity, accuracy, and precision. The LOD and LOQ for the PHRED, Kobra, and TFA methods were 0.004–0.03, 0.01–0.05, and 0.03–0.17 ng/g, respectively, and 0.01–0.10, 0.02–0.14, and 0.11–0.51 ng/g, respectively. Accuracy expressed as average recoveries was 79–110% for PHRED, 70–109% for Kobra, and 77–133% for TFA. In the three derivatization methods, the mean recoveries of AFs were significantly different, at some but not all concentrations, between matrices of dehulled corn and corn with hull (p < 0.05). For dehulled yellow corn, the TFA method consistently gave slightly poor recovery values for AFs B1 and G1 than did the PHRED and Kobra methods. The values for the TFA methods were improved by using a modified cleanup procedure. These results indicate that PHRED and Kobra derivatization methods as well as TFA method comply with the analytical requirements for AF analyses in corns.
AB - Liquid chromatographic analyses of aflatoxins (AFs) in corn, with post-column derivatization using a photochemical reactor for enhanced detection (PHRED) and a Kobra electrochemical cell system were compared with the pre-column derivatization method using trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). AFs in four different corn matrices were analyzed and validated in terms of the limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), linearity, accuracy, and precision. The LOD and LOQ for the PHRED, Kobra, and TFA methods were 0.004–0.03, 0.01–0.05, and 0.03–0.17 ng/g, respectively, and 0.01–0.10, 0.02–0.14, and 0.11–0.51 ng/g, respectively. Accuracy expressed as average recoveries was 79–110% for PHRED, 70–109% for Kobra, and 77–133% for TFA. In the three derivatization methods, the mean recoveries of AFs were significantly different, at some but not all concentrations, between matrices of dehulled corn and corn with hull (p < 0.05). For dehulled yellow corn, the TFA method consistently gave slightly poor recovery values for AFs B1 and G1 than did the PHRED and Kobra methods. The values for the TFA methods were improved by using a modified cleanup procedure. These results indicate that PHRED and Kobra derivatization methods as well as TFA method comply with the analytical requirements for AF analyses in corns.
KW - Aflatoxins analyses
KW - Corn
KW - Derivatization method
KW - Kobra electrochemical cell
KW - Photochemical reactor for enhanced detection
KW - Trifluoroacetic acid
KW - Zea mays
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991627827&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jfca.2016.09.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jfca.2016.09.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84991627827
SN - 0889-1575
VL - 54
SP - 20
EP - 26
JO - Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
JF - Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
ER -